POLITICO is reporting that the Senate is considering legislation that would create an agency that would provide water-related data and information to states and cities.

The proposal, which has been circulating in the Senate and the House, has the backing of a number of key Republican senators, including Susan Collins of Maine and John Thune of South Dakota.

Water is a hot-button issue right now in the U.S. The Republican Party has been fighting to control the water supply for decades, which is why Republican Sens.

Rand Paul of Kentucky, Mike Lee of Utah, and Tom Cotton of Arkansas have been leading the fight for years.

There are two main ways for the Republican Party to do that: through the federal government or through the states.

Currently, the federal Government has the ability to allocate billions of dollars to states that provide water.

With the Trump Administration taking over the federal Water Department, the Department of the Interior has said it wants to make sure states and localities have access to the resources that are needed to keep our water system healthy.

If you live in the middle of a drought, there is a chance that your city might not have enough water to flush its toilets or boil its water for showers and baths, so the idea is to make it easier for people to have access.

This is a great first step in the right direction, and a big step forward.

We’re all in this together.

That’s why we’re fighting for the future of our water, says Tom Cole, the director of the Center for Food Safety, an environmental advocacy group.

But the idea of the Department of the Interior is a big red flag, he says.

It would essentially be a federal agency that can set its own rules and regulations and make policy.

Even if it’s done in a good spirit, it will have a lot of power and we’re not going to be able to have a say.

We have no control over how the federal agency makes its decisions, he adds.

“This is about the future,” Cole says.

“And it’s going to cost a lot.

We don’t know what they’re going to do.”

In the House of Representatives, the Water and Emergency Management Committee has already passed legislation that aims to help cities, counties, and states get water.

But the proposal was blocked in the Republican-controlled Senate.

In an interview with POLITICO, Sen. Cory Booker of New Jersey, the ranking member of the committee, said he was concerned about how the proposal would impact people living in rural areas and other vulnerable groups, like seniors. 

“If we’re talking about water, the only thing I would want to see is people in a rural community, or someone in a small community, get the water they need, because that’s where the bulk of their water is,” Booker said.

Sen. Joe Manchin of West Virginia, another Democrat on the committee who supports the bill, also voiced concerns about the legislation.

“I don’t think that’s a good idea,” Manchin said in an interview.

“I think it’s a bad idea.

I think you’re going backwards in terms of the federal role.

Republicans also have been pushing legislation that could affect how people access their water, like the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act, which would require states to make their water systems healthier, which could lead to water shortages and reduced demand. “

What we need is a regional, statewide system, and we need to have that regional system that is accountable to the states, to the local governments, and to the people who live in those communities,” he added.

Republicans also have been pushing legislation that could affect how people access their water, like the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act, which would require states to make their water systems healthier, which could lead to water shortages and reduced demand.

As it stands, states and the federal governments are working together on some projects that could help alleviate water shortages, but many people have expressed concern about the impact on the states and communities that rely on federal funds.

For example, the U,S.

Department of Agriculture estimates that the federal Food and Nutrition Act of 2008 could reduce the cost of providing water to an estimated 6.3 million people by 2021, according to a report by the Institute for Local Self-Reliance. 

In the Senate, Sen Amy Klobuchar of Minnesota, who is also on the Agriculture Committee, said she was concerned that the legislation could have an impact on local water systems and water-use efficiency. 

She said she thinks it would be great if the federal Department of Interiors were able to give states more information on how water could be used, but that they are not required to do so. 

A spokesperson for Collins, who also voted for the bill last year, said Collins believes that it would not have the impact that she said it would have if it passed the Senate. 

Collins’ bill, the Conservation Act of 2014, would require the Department

Tags: